BTE

BTE insurer warns of “serious and detrimental effect” of personal injury reforms

Jason Tripp

A before-the-event legal expenses insurer has warned of the “unintended and very serious detrimental effect” of the government’s personal injury reforms on the market. He said the planned increase in the small claims limit for RTA cases would “cast doubt” on the ability of the BTE industry to provide legal representation.

January 18th, 2018

Financial ombudsman shift allows BTE policyholders to change to own solicitor earlier

Law Society - Front2

Clients with before-the-event legal expenses insurance can now change from panel solicitors to one of their choice earlier than was previously the case following a subtle but significant shift made by the Financial Ombudsman Service. The point at which policyholders can exercise their choice of solicitor has been the subject of argument for years.

December 11th, 2017

CJC launches BTE working group as top insurer warns that premiums may rise

Picture by Clint Randall www.pixelprphotography.co.uk

The role which before-the-event legal expenses insurance might play in improving access to justice is to be examined by a working group set up by the Civil Justice Council. BTE is to become more prominent in the wake of the government’s personal injury reforms, with one leading insurer predicting an increase in both demand and premiums as a result.

March 1st, 2017

DAS reports loss as ATE business shrinks

Andrew Burke DAS

Leading legal expenses insurer DAS dipped into the red last year, while its after-the-event insurance business shrank. The Bristol-based company reported that a loss after tax of £5.7m for 2015, compared to a restated profit of £0.5m in 2014.

October 3rd, 2016

AmTrust snaps up Arc Legal as ARAG announces strong results

Tony Buss

Legal expenses insurer AmTrust has acquired independent provider Arc Legal Assistance for an undisclosed sum. Meanwhile, fellow insurer ARAG plc yesterday announced a 12% growth in premium under management for 2015.

July 19th, 2016

BTE, hot-tubbing and QOCS in sights of new Civil Justice Council review group

Rachael Mulheron

The role which before-the-event insurance might play in improving access to justice is one of three issues that a new Civil Justice Council working party is to consider. It comes as news emerges that the Civil Procedure Rule Committee is to begin work on slimming down the CPR.

May 5th, 2016

Law firm loses 50% of costs for hiding existence of second CFA and BTE

birmingham

A district judge has decided to halve the costs awarded to claimant solicitors for unreasonable and improper conduct in concealing from the paying party the existence of a previous conditional fee agreement and before-the-event insurance.

August 27th, 2015

DAS reports strong financial growth

Paul Asplin

DAS UK Holdings has reported record income of £199.6 million in 2013, an increase of 10% over 2012. Profits before tax and reinsurance also grew strongly by 9% to £12.1m. Sales of after-the-event insurance rose 45% on 2012.

June 11th, 2014

ARAG disappointed by Law Society “survey bias”

Paul Upton ARAG

Leading legal expenses insurer ARAG has expressed its disappointment with the Law Society survey on before-the-event insurance, and suggested that the drive may be to aid law firms not on insurers’ panels.

May 9th, 2014

Legal expenses insurers have good reason to avoid non-panel firms, leading provider claims

Nick Fluck

Law firms which are not members of legal expenses insurers’ (LEI) panels charge “significantly higher” fees which “dwarf” those of panel firms, a leading LEI provider claimed yesterday.

April 29th, 2014

Blog

QOCS and multiple defendants – why both sides need to be wary

Chris McClure

The recent case of Cartwright v Venduct Engineering Limited [2018] EWCA Civ 1654 represents a very interesting development in the interpretation of rule 44.14. The question before the Court of Appeal was this: where, in a matter to which QOCS applies, a claimant has brought an action against multiple defendants, is a successful defendant entitled to enforce a costs award in its favour against damages recovered by the claimant from an unsuccessful defendant?

August 16th, 2018

Featured Associate

Featured Associate

Legal Protection Group

Visit website