The free guide to costs, funding and the Jackson reforms
News archive
-
2017
-
– October
(22)
- MoJ “keen” on Jackson fixed costs reforms but they will generate “cottage industry”, says leading QC
- Ministry of Justice begins process of refunding £33m in employment tribunal fees
- Hands up who knows what litigation financiers sell?
- Hodge urges judges and lawyers to improve “scientific literacy” to understand expert evidence
- District judge takes claim for whistleblower protection to Court of Appeal
- “ADR is failing” says Civil Justice Council but compulsion is not yet the answer
- Government accepts Jackson’s call for CJC to seek industry agreement on low-value clin neg claims
- “Panicked” solicitor suspended for signing witness statements himself
- Is litigation funding dead?
- Ministry of Justice “set to repeat mistakes of LASPO”, warns MASS chairman
- Hunt unveils plan to provide state-backed indemnity scheme for GPs
- Regan: £250,000 threshold for High Court cases on the way
- High Court denies claimants relief from sanctions after “serious and substantial default”
- Regional costs judge reverses position on part 36 offers in fixed-costs cases
- Thinktank report urges “ultimate” form of no-fault compensation for clinical negligence
- Six-month warning – lawyers told they cannot ignore electronic bill of costs
- What clients really want
- Competition Appeal Tribunal decision to refuse biggest-ever class action “not susceptible to appeal”
- Gone but not forgotten – Asons ordered to pay costs after running case without claimant’s knowledge
- High Court questions growing use of standstill agreements
- Strong support from UK public for consumer class actions, while half back third-party funding
- Third-party funder backs major potential claim against patent renewal business
- + September (25)
- + August (27)
- + July (40)
- + June (28)
- + May (28)
- + April (18)
- + March (30)
- + February (28)
- + January (18)
-
– October
(22)
