News archive
2019
-
– October
(21)
- Master sets out approach to interim costs in clin neg cases
- Vos: Woolf reforms were “inadequately revolutionary”
- Court of Appeal issues guidance on QOCS in ‘mixed’ claims
- Official worried that lawyers might “abuse” reformed DBAs
- Lomax and the irresistible rise of ADR
- Credit card lie “made PI claimant fundamentally dishonest”
- CJC group fails to agree fixed costs for clin neg cases
- Review lays ground for both hybrid and defendant DBAs
- Master urges APIL and FOIL to agree recordings protocol
- Redacting solicitor’s comments to client was “cherry picking”
- High Court issues “novel” conditional costs order
- IBA: “Give computers legal personality so they can be sued”
- Supreme Court to hear Mastercard CPO appeal
- Artificial and actual intelligence: Using tech in litigation
- Law firm “positively invited” client to end retainer
- High Court judge urges update of guideline hourly rates
- CA boosts representative actions with Google green light
- Is the fear of clinical negligence litigation overblown?
- Neuberger: expert witnesses can learn from Supreme Court
- Burford goes to court to force LSE to identify “manipulators”
- Scotland to keep discount rate at -0.75%
- + September (30)
- + August (29)
- + July (33)
- + June (25)
- + May (28)
- + April (28)
- + March (27)
- + February (30)
- + January (24)
-
– October
(21)