13 March 2015Print This Post

Civil court fee hike “to drive increase in arbitration”

Polycarpou: new issue fee is heavy burden to bear

Polycarpou: new issue fee is heavy burden to bear

The rise in court fees this week has removed one of the standard objections to arbitration – that it costs more than litigation – and is likely to drive the take-up of this form of ADR, a City lawyer has argued.

While claimants face paying 5% of the value of their claim as a court fee, up to a cap of £10,000, the registration fee payable to the London Court of International Arbitration for starting an arbitration is £1,750, said Eleni Polycarpou, head of arbitration at Withers.

“Of course, there are other costs associated with arbitrations, most notably the fact that arbitrators charge an hourly rate whereas judges do not. Even so, the new issue fee is a heavy burden to bear so early in the proceedings, in circumstances where only around 3% of claims issued get to trial.”

She said the rush to issue claims last week indicated that parties regarded the new fees as a significant outlay.

“Of course, that in itself may cause problems to come: although the benefit of taking advantage of the reduced issuing fees is obvious, there is a danger that, by hastily issuing in such circumstances, solicitors may find themselves liable to costs orders against them where savvy defendants successfully seek an order for strike-out due to the premature issuing of a claim form.

“In the alternative, ill-informed clients unaware of the excessive increase may also seek to bring claims for negligence against their solicitors for not issuing their claim prior to the increase in the issue fee.

“Either way, it will drive potential litigants away from the traditional route of court proceedings and lead them to look to alternative means by which to resolve their disputes,” Ms Polycarpou said.

By Neil Rose

Tags: ,


One Response to “Civil court fee hike “to drive increase in arbitration””

  1. Arbitration is also mercifully free of the costs budgeting regime that has rendered court litigation even more of a lottery.

    We are now at the point where litigation that began in the early days of costs budgeting is coming to an end and claims for costs by the successful party are bing presented, often far in excess of the agreed or approved costs budgets. Many of these claims, if over the figures in the costs budget, are coming specataularly to grief, and the sums ordered are frequently substantially below the costs that have actualy been incurred.

    Litigants, faced paying with huge fees at the outset and then with costs difficuties at the end, even if successful, I think will begin to abandon the courts altogether, which can only be good for arbitration.

  2. Ian Ridd on March 27th, 2015 at 10:30 am

Leave a comment

We encourage you to be part of the Litigation Futures community but please note that all comments will be moderated before posting. We draw your attention to clause 5 of the Terms and Conditions of the site, which deals with user-generated content.