Litigators confident that work will remain post-Brexit


Acratopulo: Insufficient diversity at senior levels

Most litigation lawyers (57%) believe there will not be significant loss of work to other jurisdictions in the wake of Brexit, a survey has found.

Only 28% expected there to be a loss, while the rest did not know.

Meanwhile, a large majority (83%) said the legal profession should do more to promote diversity and inclusion.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and New Law Journal contacted 126 lawyers, 76% of them working in large litigation teams of 21 or more, for their annual litigation trends survey.

Most litigators (58%) said “cost was not a significant factor” in their client’s decision when it came to pursuing litigation in London rather than elsewhere. Only 19% thought it was a significant factor.

“Multiple respondents answered that, irrespective of cost, London remains favourable due to its reputation for the quality of its judiciary, perception of judicial independence and procedural features of our system.”

When it came to ranking those qualities, the quality of judges was the most popular (37%), followed by judicial independence (32%) and procedures (27%).

Two-thirds of lawyers thought a spike in litigation affecting businesses operating across borders was inevitable in the aftermath of Brexit.

They were generally optimistic about the state of the litigation market, with 44% saying the market was growing, compared to 38% describing it as unchanged.

On diversity, litigators said the top three priorities for improvement were encouraging flexible working and job sharing (81%), promoting and supporting social mobility (77%) and improving workplace culture (75%).

Julian Acratopulo, president of the LSLA and partner at Clifford Chance, commented: “This survey starkly underlines the fact that there is not enough diversity across senior positions in the legal profession. It’s clear that, collectively, the profession needs to pick up the pace of change.

“It is not a question of whether good work is being done to help solve the issues – it is, and that much is clear to us all.

“But it is vital we make sure solutions aren’t delivered ‘in silos’ and don’t look at fragmented parts of the problem. We need to take a holistic approach, rather than a piecemeal one.

“I firmly believe that technology is absolutely key to this. Diversity and technology go hand in hand, and need to be viewed as such.

“Better digitisation opens up more opportunities for lawyers to work flexibly or remotely (as cases can be conducted online rather than in person). This helps to break down the barriers that can dissuade people from joining/progressing in the profession.”




    Readers Comments

  • Get Qoral Health says:

    Looking at the third period, London is a massive financial centre and European business is obviously important to London, it remains to be seen whether or not that European business will be affected by being outside the EU in the longer term. There s an awful lot of non-EU related business done in London whether that s UK work or that s work everywhere else outside the EU and I m sure that will continue. The simple fact is that London has the representative offices of more financial institutions than anywhere else in the world. That won t change overnight, the concentration of expertise which you find in London will not change overnight and it remains to be seen whether or not there is a prolonged negative impact for the City caused by being outside the EU. We don t know the answer because no EU country has ever done this before, so it s the land of the unknown.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog

21 September 2020

Why arbitration hasn’t worked for personal injury

I can’t say I’m surprised that PIcARBS looks to have run its course. While the lack of interest has been put down to lawyers not wanting to trial the service, market forces are decisive and the market is right.

Read More