MedCo regime goes live


Whiplash reform: no financial links between claimant lawyer and expert

Whiplash reform: no financial links between claimant lawyer and expert

All medical reports for whiplash claims must now be brought under the MedCo system after it formally went live yesterday.

Users of the service – both those providing reports and those commissioning them – have been warned that it can take between five and 10 days for their applications to become authorised users to be processed if they have not done so by now.

Claimants will be given the choice of one “high-volume national” medical reporting organisation (MRO) and six smaller ones, or seven medical experts.

Among the features of a high-volume national MRO are the capacity to process at least 40,000 independent medical reports each year, that it has contractual arrangements with at least 250 individual medical experts, and at registration it has a minimum of five distinct clients, which are not associated organisations with the MRO, with none of them representing more than 40% of its total instructions.

The high-volume MROs will be charged £75,000 a year to be a member of MedCo, with other MROs charged £15,000, and individual experts £150.

Lorraine Rogerson, the independent chair of the MedCo board, said: “We would encourage users to sign up at their earliest opportunity to minimise any internal disruption to their service whilst we process their registration. We are also encouraging users to familiarise themselves with the entry criteria in advance to ensure registrations are approved first time round.”

One of the purposes of the system is to ensure claimant representatives do not have any direct financial links with MROs and medical experts. MedCo has cautioned them to check that their declarations of direct financial links are up-to-date “on a regular basis”.

Tags:




Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog

18 October 2018
Claire Stockford

An analogue decision? Google defeats attempt at consumer ‘class action’

In an eagerly awaited judgment, the High Court handed down its ruling in Richard Lloyd v Google LLC on 8 October. It seems clear that there is a degree of reluctance to permit group litigation which will not materially benefit consumers. That being said, it is hard to ignore the increased possibilities of group litigation in the context of corporate data breaches, particularly following the implementation of GDPR earlier this year.

Read More