21 January 2015Print This Post

Military claims not subject to EL fixed success fees, says High Court

Military claims: significant number of EL cases in pipeline

Military claims: significant number of EL cases in pipeline

A High Court test case decided yesterday that members of the armed forces are not employees for the purposes of the pre-1 April 2013 fixed success fee regime in employers’ liability claims.

Counsel for the Ministry of Defence (MoD) told the court that the novel point was important in a significant number of continuing pre-Jackson cases.

Broni & Ors v Ministry of Defence [2015] EWHC 66 (QB) brought together three claims relating to injuries suffered by servicemen while training. Both Master O’Hare in two of them and Deputy Master James in the other decided that they were employees as required by the old CPR 45.20.

This defined an employee by reference to section 2(1) of the Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969 as “an individual who has entered into or works under a contract of service or apprenticeship with an employer”.

The claimants argued that the law is clear that a serving member of the armed services is not an employee under a contract of service and there was no proper basis for construing part 45 more broadly.

The Ministry of Defence responded by calling for a purposive approach to the construction of the words ‘contract of service’.

Mr Justice Supperstone found for the claimants, ruling that there was “no scope for giving a broad or purposive interpretation”.

He added: “The Ministry of Defence owe a duty of care to servicemen whether they work under a contract of service or not, both at common law and under the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974.”

The judge acknowledged that the ruling could cause difficulties at detailed assessments if the court had to investigate whether the claimant had a contract of service.

Determination of the success fees was remitted to Master Haworth.

By admin

Tags: , ,


One Response to “Military claims not subject to EL fixed success fees, says High Court”

  1. Great Result, well done BOLT BURDON KEMP

  2. Susan Slattery on January 21st, 2015 at 10:07 am

Leave a comment

We encourage you to be part of the Litigation Futures community but please note that all comments will be moderated before posting. We draw your attention to clause 5 of the Terms and Conditions of the site, which deals with user-generated content.