Planning Court launch marks start of government’s judicial review reforms


Grayling: Planning Court is crucial step forwards

The first stage of the government’s reforms to judicial review – the creation of a Planning Court for England and Wales – has come into operation with the aim of speeding up the court process and reducing delays to hundreds of infrastructure projects.

More than 30 cases are already scheduled to be heard in the next three months, with an estimated 400 planning cases a year expected to be resolved by using the Planning Court rather than the main Administrative Court.

The court is based at the Royal Courts of Justice but will be able to sit at other regional venues across England and Wales when necessary. It will hear judicial reviews and other appeals on planning issues.

Justice secretary Chris Grayling said: “We are making sure that big building projects, which create thousands of jobs in our communities, don’t get held up by unnecessary delays in the legal process.

“The new Planning Court will make sure cases are heard quicker and by judges with specialist expertise of planning issues. It is crucial step forwards.”

Last year the time limit for applying for a judicial review of a planning decision was halved from three months to six weeks.

Most of the changes to JR are being introduced through the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, which is currently before Parliament. They include significant changes to the costs rules, as well as widening the criteria to allow certain high-profile cases to leapfrog from the High Court to the Supreme Court.

Challenges over procedural defects will also be changed. At the moment the court can refuse to grant permission or award a final remedy on the basis that it is “inevitable” that the complained-of failure would not have made a difference to the original outcome; the threshold will be brought down to “highly unlikely”.

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Finola Moss says:

    The end of the separation of powers, and the rule of law, and the beginning of totalitarianism.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog

18 October 2018
Claire Stockford

An analogue decision? Google defeats attempt at consumer ‘class action’

In an eagerly awaited judgment, the High Court handed down its ruling in Richard Lloyd v Google LLC on 8 October. It seems clear that there is a degree of reluctance to permit group litigation which will not materially benefit consumers. That being said, it is hard to ignore the increased possibilities of group litigation in the context of corporate data breaches, particularly following the implementation of GDPR earlier this year.

Read More