Poll: no increase in use of single joint experts post-Jackson


Solon: budgeting for experts can increase costs

There is little sign of the Jackson reforms achieving the goal of an increase in single joint experts being instructed, new research has indicated.

A survey of 165 experts by training company Bond Solon found that just 14% said the number of instructions to act as a single joint expert had gone up, while 21% said it had reduced.

For the majority, there had been no change.

The poll found scepticism among the experts about the Jackson reforms more broadly as well. Two-thirds of respondents felt they would not increase access to justice, correlating with the finding that only 38% believed costs would fall as a result of the changes.

Similarly, only 31% of respondents thought budgeting would reduce costs, while a fifth predicted that it would instead increase them.

Mark Solon, managing director of Bond Solon Training, said: “A requirement to itemise experts’ projected expenditure, in order to submit an accurate estimate, might actually lead to more elements of work being taken into account. There is also a need for the legal team to isolate the main issues at the beginning of a case, and that process in itself may incur costs if experts are required to help.”

Mr Solon said it was too early to say whether the Jackson reforms were a factor in a fall in the number of experts who saw more instructions over the past year – 45% in 2013, compared to 55% in 2012.

The average hourly rate for report writing was £174 for the last 12 months, compared with £162 for the previous year.

The survey also looked at experts’ experience of litigants in person (LiPs) and found it had been largely negative. Experts’ complaints about LIPs included not being paid – “although solicitors’ firms also earn criticism in this area,” Mr Solon noted – with the most commonly repeated word being ‘nightmare’.

He said: “To balance this, though, their experiences are by definition restricted to the type of LIP who instructs an expert; there are other kinds of LIP who either carry out their own research or are themselves expert in some way.”

Tags:




    Readers Comments

  • Dr Sally M. Wood says:

    I find it extraordinarily hard to give a quote for time for reading documents without actually seeing the documents. Single or double spaced? Does 10 pages mean 20 sides of print? Handwritten reports can be tricky. Its just impossible! Then one can never know how much research may result.


Leave a Comment

By clicking Submit you consent to Legal Futures storing your personal data and confirm you have read our Privacy Policy and section 5 of our Terms & Conditions which deals with user-generated content. All comments will be moderated before posting.

Required fields are marked *
Email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog

18 October 2018
Claire Stockford

An analogue decision? Google defeats attempt at consumer ‘class action’

In an eagerly awaited judgment, the High Court handed down its ruling in Richard Lloyd v Google LLC on 8 October. It seems clear that there is a degree of reluctance to permit group litigation which will not materially benefit consumers. That being said, it is hard to ignore the increased possibilities of group litigation in the context of corporate data breaches, particularly following the implementation of GDPR earlier this year.

Read More